Talk:Ponds

Article Quality

 * Unfortunately When I saw this article, I realized this was exactly the thing I disliked about this wikia's old style. While editing it, I had created a Wookieepedia style article that expanded highly on the low grade shell of an article that existed. During this however, TVLwriter edited over it, making my changes null and void. My job here (as I see it) is to expand and edit (in some cases highly) on the stubs and articles made hastily by people who just don't understand wikia editing. I do not want to continue having to do this, so I ask this: Please, if you are not prepared to make a great article, just don't make an article. It is as simple as that. Cad Bane Owns 03:59, March 2, 2011 (UTC)User:Cad Bane Owns.


 * Yes it appears that we all tried to edit this article at the same time, causing a mess. And also Cad Bane Owns, seeing you edit sumary description, you should try to encourage new editors and not deter them from editing here. Yes, I agree, there were many minor and awkward mistakes, and I will explain Reilly.m.miller what he did wrong.TVLwriter 04:11, March 2, 2011 (UTC)
 * Yes, I see your point. Sometimes when the wikia is flooded with new edits, I take it upon myself to judge them. I know that in the case of new editors, that is a repugnant attitude.

Sorry, I didn't have enough time to write a whole article about it, I improved it with even more information that has been left out from edits. I also never wrote a wiki before, so don't judge me.


 * Guessing you are Reilly.m.miller, Thats fine. You created a great 'foundation' for this article for others to improve and edit later. Those were just some helpful tips I left on your talk page to help you get used to how a wiki operates. Another tip would be to sign your messages like this: ~ It's great that you came here and decided to help. This wiki is low on editors. TVLwriter  22:44, March 2, 2011 (UTC)

Ponds's Designation
Despite what is heard in Lethal Trackdown, Ponds's entry on StarWars.com states his designation is CC-6454. This source is given precedence as it is the most recently published. Bane7670 (talk) 19:43, October 12, 2012 (UTC)
 * Until now, when people change their minds... Bane7670 (talk) 21:50, May 10, 2015 (UTC)